|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Ethics Commission
Campaign Consultant Filing, Second Quarter 2003
CAMPAIGN CONSULTANT FILING SECOND QUARTER 2003 Introduction In November 1997, San Francisco voters approved the Regulation of Campaign Consultants Ordinance ("Ordinance"), San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code Sections 1.500-1.540. The Ordinance requires persons who earn $1,000 or more per year for campaign consultant services to register with the Ethics Commission and file quarterly activity reports. The second quarter activity reports were due on June 16, 2003 and covered the filing period beginning March 1, 2003 and ending May 31, 2003.1 Fifty-one campaign consultants filed with the Ethics Commission in the second quarter of 2003.2 Comparative Data The level of campaign consultant activity has fluctuated since the first filing in June 1998 (the second quarter of 1998). The chart on the next page compares data compiled pertaining to campaign consultant activity since implementation of the Ordinance. As indicated, the level of campaign consultant activity generally increases or decreases depending on 1) whether an election is held and 2) the number and type of local items on the ballot. There was considerable activity in the fourth quarter 2002 due to the large number of highly contested local ballot measures and candidates running for five vacant seats on the Board of Supervisors. In contrast, campaign consultant activity was considerably less during the first quarter 2003 because the period of coverage included mainly wind-down activities from the November 2002 election and the December 2002 run-off election. Campaign consultant activity increased slightly during the second quarter of 2003 due to the upcoming November 4, 2003 election.
1 The Campaign Consultant Ordinance The Ordinance defines "campaign consultant" as a person or entity that receives or is promised $1,000 or more in a calendar year for providing either of the following services: "Campaign Management," defined as conducting, coordinating or supervising a campaign to elect, defeat, retain or recall a local candidate, or to adopt or defeat a local ballot measure, including but not limited to: (a) Hiring or authorizing the hiring of campaign staff and consultants; or (b) Spending or authorizing the expenditure of campaign funds; or (c) Directing, supervising or conducting the solicitation of campaign contributions; or (d) Selecting or recommending vendors or subvendors of goods or services for the campaign. "Campaign Strategy," defined as planning for the election, defeat, retention or recall of a local candidate, or for the adoption or defeat of a local ballot measure, including not but limited to: (a) Producing or authorizing the production of campaign literature and print and broadcast advertising; or (b) Seeking endorsements of organizations or individuals; or (c) Seeking financing; or (d) Advising on public policy positions. Employees of campaign consultants do not themselves qualify as campaign consultants. However, persons and entities that subcontract with a campaign consultant to provide campaign consulting services and that receive or are promised $1,000 or more in a calendar year do qualify as campaign consultants. Similarly, employees of campaigns who engage in campaign management or campaign strategy and are promised or receive $1,000 or more in a calendar year also qualify as campaign consultants. Campaign consultants are required to report only activity associated with local candidates or local ballot measures. For purposes of the Ordinance, "candidate" means: (1) a person who has taken affirmative action to seek nomination or election to local office, or (2) a local officeholder who has taken affirmative action to seek nomination or election to any elective office, or (3) a local officeholder who is the subject of a recall election. "Local officeholder" means the following elected officers: Mayor, Members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, City Attorney, District Attorney, Treasurer, Sheriff, Assessor, Public Defender, Members of the Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District, and Members of the Governing Board of the San Francisco Community College District. "Measure" means a local referendum, or a local ballot measure, whether or not it qualifies for the ballot. The Commission staff has compiled the information filed by campaign consultants for the second quarter of 2003 in the attached tables. All amounts reported by campaign consultants have been rounded off. Description of Quarterly Report Tables Forty-three out of the fifty-one filers reported activity pertaining to the November 5, 2002, December 10, 2002 and November 4, 2003 elections.4 Table 1 reflects the elective offices and ballot measures appearing on the ballots. Table 2 summarizes all reported activity by campaign consultants for the second quarter of 2003. Filers are listed in descending order of the payments received. Also reported are the total payments promised by clients and any political contributions or gifts to officeholders made by the filers. Filers are required to report "economic consideration" promised by or received from clients in exchange for campaign consulting services during the applicable reporting period. Economic consideration includes payments, fees, commissions, and reimbursements for expenses, gifts or anything else of value. Table 3 lists the name of the filer in alphabetical order, the filer's clients, the services performed for that client, the payment promised by the client in the reporting period, and the payment actually received. The table also indicates the total payments promised or received by all filers. The payments promised by all clients to filers during the second quarter totaled $486,555. The payments received by all filers from clients during the second quarter totaled $530,434. Filers must report each political contribution of $100 or more to a candidate for local office, a committee controlled by a local officeholder or a candidate for local office, or a ballot measure committee whether or not the committee is controlled by a local officeholder or a candidate for local office. Filers must report contributions of $100 or more made or delivered by the filer, or made by the filer's client at the filer's behest, or for which the filer acted as an agent or intermediary during the reporting period. This chart indicates the political contributions made by campaign consultants during the reporting period. The total reported amount of political contributions made by filers during the second quarter was $3,250. Each filer must report economic consideration promised to or received by the filer during the reporting period from vendors and subvendors who provide campaign-related goods or services to the filer's current clients. The payments promised by or received from vendors or subvendors during the second quarter totaled $888, and the total payments received from vendors or subvendors totaled $0. Each filer must report any gifts promised or made by the filer to a local officeholder during the reporting period which in the aggregate total $50 or more. No filer reported any gifts promised or made to a local officeholder during this reporting period. Employment of Local Officeholders and City Employees If the filer employs a local officeholder or City employee during the reporting period, the filer must report the name of the officeholder or City employee and describe the nature of the employment by the filer. In addition, if a client of the filer employs a local officeholder or City employee at the behest of the filer during the reporting period, the filer must report the name of the client, the name of each officeholder or City employee hired by the client, and the nature of the employment by the client. No filer reported activity in this category. If the filer obtains a City contract during the reporting period and the contract is approved by a local officeholder who is the filer's client, the filer must report the contract, the date the contract was obtained, and the name of the officeholder who approved the contract. No filer reported obtaining a City contract during the reporting period. If the filer is appointed to public office during the reporting period and the appointment is made by a local officeholder who is the filer's client, the filer must report the public office to which the filer was appointed, the date of the appointment, and the name of the officeholder who appointed the filer. No filer reported appointment to public office during the reporting period. 1 Under the Ordinance, the second quarter report is due June 15. However, since June 15 was a Sunday, the deadline was moved to the next business day. 2 All campaign consultants are sent pre-deadline notices. Non-filers are subject to late fines. One registered campaign consultant, Doug Schoen, has not filed a second quarter 2003 report as of the date of issuance of this report. 3 See footnote 2. 4 See footnote 2. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||